Tag Archives: Steve Schmidt

Donald Trump and Presidential leadership in the era of the coronavirus pandemic

First, “Donald Trump: A Study in Leadership,” a brief video that contrasts Trump with other world leaders.

Ann Applebaum comments, “One knows, of course, that Donald Trump behaves differently from the leaders of other countries, especially the leaders of other Western democracies. One knows that he disdains facts; that he does not read briefing papers; that he has no organizational talents; that he does not know how to make use of militaries, bureaucracies, or diplomatic services; that he has no basic knowledge of history or science, let alone government.

But seeing him in this video, produced by my colleagues in Atlantic Studios, juxtaposed with other world leaders during this coronavirus pandemic comes, nevertheless, as a shock.”

Second, the views of a founding member of the Never Trump movement, Steve Schmidt:

“I think that what makes the country exceptional is that we’re made up of all the peoples of the world. We’re the only country in the history of the world that’s founded on the power of an idea. And that idea, though it was wrapped in injustice and hypocrisy, is that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with inalienable rights. And over time that came to include African Americans, Hispanic Americans, women, gay men and women — and we still have work to do.

But that collection of people — Americans — we have fed more people, clothed more people, liberated more people, cured more people, and done more general good in the world than all the other countries of the world put together since the beginning of time.

And for the last 75 years, since the end of World War II, we’ve lived in an American era. It was a liberal, U.S.-led, liberal global world order that was architected in the mind of the twentieth century’s greatest president, FDR. It was built by Harry Truman. It was maintenanced from presidents between Eisenhower and Obama of both parties. And it has ended.

Donald Trump has been the worst president this country has ever had. And I don’t say that hyperbolically. He is.

But he is a consequential president. And he has brought this country in three short years to a place of weakness that is simply unimaginable if you were pondering where we are today from the day [when] Barack Obama left office. And there were a lot of us on that day who were deeply skeptical and very worried about what a Trump presidency would be.

But this is a moment of unparalleled national humiliation. Of weakness. When you listen to the President, these are the musings of an imbecile, an idiot. And I don’t use those words to name-call. I use them because they’re the precise words in the English language to describe his behavior, his comportment, his actions.

We’ve never seen a level of incompetence, a level of ineptitude so staggering on a daily basis by anybody in the history of the country who’s ever been charged with substantial responsibilities. It’s just astonishing that this man is the President of the United States.

The man, the con man from New York City — many bankruptcies, failed businesses, a reality show that branded him as something that he never was: a successful businessman.

Well, he’s the President of the United States now and the man who said that he would make the country great again. He’s brought death, suffering, and economic collapse on truly an epic scale.

And let’s be clear. This isn’t happening in every country around the world. This place, our place, our home, our country — the United States — we are the epicenter. We are the place where you’re most likely to die of this disease. We’re the ones with the most shattered economy.

And we are because of the fool that sits in the Oval Office behind the Resolute Desk.”

(Editor’s note: in a future post I intend to reference these remarks, which provide context and contrast for the discussion about whether or not Trump is a weak president.)

Never-Trumper Steve Schmidt is back — and still spinning for the (pre-Trump) GOP

Steve Schmidt returned to MSNBC last week, having spent eight months consulting with Howard Schultz regarding a presidential campaign by the billionaire, and his criticism of Donald Trump is as sharp and on target as ever. It is great fun to read (or listen to) this never-Trumper, who left the Republican Party last year (“Today I renounce my membership in the Republican Party. It is fully the party of Trump.“). He has Trump’s number.

But he is still whitewashing the complicity — pre-Trump — of the Republican Party in what it has become.

Voting in America for a substantial part of the population is no longer about affirming a belief in the future, it’s an act of aggression. It’s an action taken to choose someone to punish their enemies. And that more than anything is how Trump has redefined American politics. Not even the pretense of unity.

And:

“My perspective is that the Republican party is profoundly corrupted by Donald Trump and it has been corrupted by a tolerance for all and any type of amoral and immoral behavior. Tolerance for astounding levels of corruption and exposure of hypocrisy from the religious far-right leaders like Falwell, to everybody who screamed and shouted about some perfidious act that Obama or the Clintons allegedly committed. Trump has remade the Republican party into an isolationist, grievance-driven, resentment-driven political party. The party looks like what it might have looked like if George Wallace had captured its nomination and become president.”

Strike the word ‘isolationist’ from Schmidt’s indictment. While individual Republicans — John McCain, whom Schmidt advised, stands out — might have stood for more than grievance-driven and resentment-driven politics, these strands were deeply embedded in the contemporary Republican Party long before Trump’s ride down the escalator.

I’ll grant that George W. Bush (whom Schmidt also advised) gave us a bit more than “the pretense of unity.” But the GOP establishment in Washington repudiated Bush’s outreach to ethnic and religious minorities (which was the most significant element of Bush’s electoral strategy that made unity more than a pretense). This Republican pushback came years before Trump became a candidate. To put it bluntly: the party resisted unity.

And Schmidt’s post-Trump indictment doesn’t even make sense on its own terms: “Tolerance for astounding levels of corruption and exposure of hypocrisy from the religious far-right leaders like Falwell, to everybody who screamed and shouted about some perfidious act that Obama or the Clintons allegedly committed.”

The unhinged screaming and shouting about Obama and the Clintons cannot possibly be placed at the feet of Donald Trump. George W. Bush couldn’t have come close enough to steal the 2000 election (even granting Bill Clinton’s sleazy behavior) without the far right’s bizarre tales of murder and more. And Donald Trump didn’t found the Tea Party or advise Mitch McConnell on his scorched earth opposition to Barack Obama.

So, I’m with Schmidt on his repudiation of Trump and the post-Trump Republican Party. But the GOP’s corruption and hypocrisy have been flourishing for more than a generation. Trump didn’t remake the Republican Party. He is just the most recent step in an ugly evolution.

(Image: MSNBC.)